|
|
|
|
IPO
|
|
September / October 2004 |
| by
Thomas Logoreci |
LIGHTS,
CAMERA, DIRECT!
IPO’s Improv
Daniel Gamburg Puts the Actors Behind the Camera
|
In the
San Francisco-shot DV feature IPO, actor David
Babich has one of those definitive movie moments,
the
kind of memorable scene that often ends up adorning
a film’s poster. With his Internet startup
job in jeopardy and recently rejected by his girlfriend,
a drunken Babich prowls the downtown streets caught
up in the middle of a New Year’s celebration.
Stumbling across a homeless woman (MiMi Alain), Babich’s
character (formerly homeless himself) tries to reach
out to the distraught woman by giving her his shoes.
When even she rejects him, he strips down to his
underwear and begins a cathartic run into the night.
Coming where it does in IPO, the scene is an
exultant moment for both the character
and the audience. But
what’s extraordinary is that this perfectly sustained
note comes not so much from the film’s director, Daniel Gamburg, but largely
from improvisational work initiated by Babich and Alain. Babich knew that at
that point in the story his character, Joe, had reached a critical juncture.
During filming, Babich met up with Alain at the restaurant where the two of them
were working. “MiMi—she’s an actor as well—and I came
up with the idea for the transformation of this character,” says Babich. “We
basically developed the idea of the scene, ran it by Daniel, and he was like ‘Absolutely,
let’s try it.’”
In many ways, IPO’s riches-to-rags dot-com saga may be the ultimate collaboration
between actor and director. Taking a cue from Lars von Trier’s Dogme 95
manifesto, in which the Danish director advocated using only handheld cameras,
natural lighting, and real settings, Gamburg upped the aesthetic ante by entirely
tossing out the script. With just a bare bones plot, Gamburg and another cameraman,
Robin McLeod, shot the completely improvised IPO in a little over twenty days
for around $30,000 dollars. “I told myself I would do it on digital video.
I didn’t need a million dollars,” says Gamburg. “I
can give actors complete freedom and space, [and] still create that raw
sense
of spontaneity.”
Rehearsals went on for six months with the cast
fleshing out characterizations, running through
possible scenarios, and even taking turns
at the camera. “It
empowered them to try different things, to explore their own point of view, and
ultimately to express themselves by seeing and controlling their own work,” says
Gamburg. “The actors started to understand what it’s like for me
to capture an event and how they can effect the outcome.” For IPO’s
actual shoot, Gamburg rented a large warehouse space in the Mission and
completely refitted as if it were to be a working startup company. To
capture every
line of dialogue from the dozen or so performers, each actor was individually
miked
with wireless sound as they ran through takes that sometimes went as
long as forty-five minutes.
Throughout, Gamburg and McLeod swirled around
this unplanned action, recording everything
as if it were a documentary. The director
never
thought twice
about the choices he’d made. “That’s the biggest dilemma I have watching
Hollywood films. I see a script, I can see the words, I know where it’s
going to go,” he says. “It doesn’t matter what I do with the
camera when it comes to the person in front of it. The camera is literally just
a recording device. In the end, it’s just a machine.”
Gamburg, who seems to do everything to extremes,
realized a need to understand the acting
process while attending film production
classes
at San Francisco
State University in the early ’90s. “In film school, they teach you about
film theory, genre, aesthetics, and history. But they don’t teach you the
actual working relationship between what’s happening in front of the camera
and how to record that reality,” says Gamburg. He made a pact with
himself to give up any further ambitions about filmmaking until he learned
to direct
actors.
When a slot opened up at acting coach Philip
Bennett’s TheaterLab,
Gamburg filled the directorial void and formed the BareWitness ensemble.
Together,
Gamburg and the actors honed their craft by producing a dozen short films,
some of which
screened on the festival circuit, at local venues, and online (barewitness.com).
(Gamburg has run the school since Bennett retired in 2002; theaterfilmlab.com)
Owing to this experience, Gamburg and the actors had the confidence to
embark on IPO, their first feature.
It’s not surprising that an enormous challenge awaited Gamburg in the editing
room. The vérité style of shooting each improvised scene in its
entirety left the filmmaker with eighty hours of footage. After a year alone
with the material, the first cut of IPO ran somewhere in the neighborhood of
seven hours. He eventually whittled it down to a three-hour cut that McLeod and
many of the BareWitness actors loved. By the time IPO had secured a slot in last
year’s Slamdance competition, the film clocked in at 110 minutes.
Gamburg pulls no punches about what his IPO experience
garnered him in terms of financial gain. “The problem with this process is that it’s not
a very commercial way to work. I could probably never do this again. My next
film will have to be more conventional.” Though he is developing three
projects with BareWitness—each to be directed by other members of the ensemble—he
does have plans to direct a feature outside the group. He won’t say much
about it except that the script involves an actor’s harrowing encounter
with the Russian mob. After facing IPO’s challenging obstacles, Gamburg
certainly knows a little more about what an actor goes through to prepare for
a role. “It was an exciting time of discovery for all of us. We had no
idea where it was going to go. The great thing about this collaboration is that
the technology gave people a voice, people who normally don’t get
a voice. What more can a director ask for?”
Director’s
Choice:
Daniel Gamburg on Mike Leigh
“Mike Leigh’s Secrets and Lies: Cynthia, played by Brenda Blethyn,
realizes that Hortense, played by Marianne Jean-Baptiste, is her daughter. The
moment
is riveting and the camera does not budge or cut for almost ten minutes. When
I watch most Leigh films, I see no script or actors. I see life unfolding moment
to moment. I've used him as a launching point to the way I work.”
IPO screens at the Film Arts Festival
(Nov. 11–14); watch for the festival program in the next issue of Release
Print. Thomas
Logoreci is a filmmaker and a frequent contributor
to Release Print. He recently received a Film Arts
development grant for his film My Three Albanias.
©2004 Film
Arts Foundation
This article first appeared in the September/October 2004 issue of Release
Print, the magazine of Film Arts Foundation. Reprinted by permission.
|
|
| San
Francisco Bay Guardian |
|
| June
2-8 • Vol.
38 • No.
36 (source) |
| by Robert
Avila |
Daniel
Gamburg's improvised film, IPO – a
wryly intelligent, extremely well-acted portrait
of the city during the dot-com era – is
an accordingly apt SFIC festival offering.
|
|
|
|
by
Scott Weinberg |
We all remember when the Internet went boom, right?
Stories about how Johnny Amazon made a trillion bucks
were replaced with tale after miserable tale of overt
and horrific failure. The latecomers had made their
move just a little too late; all the spoils had been
claimed.
That's something that the goofball characters in
IPO don't know yet: that they're already out of work,
despite
the catered office parties and the impressive-looking
nameplates. That Holy Grail of Internet pioneers,
the "IPO",
is the brass ring they'll never get to grasp.
At least not with Hot-Tot.com, anyway.
Equal parts ensemble comedy and knowing wink to
the early days of Online Greed, Daniel Gamburg's
IPO is a quiet and unassuming affair, the sort of
movie that becomes engrossing without your even noticing.
Sure, it's not as flashy or refined as the multiplex
fodder, but let's not knock a first-time filmmaker
for honing his talents with the digital technologies
that make movies like IPO possible in the first place.
The story's the thing, as they say, and with the
dizzying array of colorful characters that Gamburg
has conceived, IPO has story to spare. We got well-intentioned
(yet under-prepared) young moneymen, an office manager
with stars in her eyes, and a collection of intermittently
hardworking office types - all of whom are desperately
clinging to the hope of a bigtime cash windfall...if
and when their project succeeds.
Not content to simply lay the history out there
as something to mock with hindsight, Gamburg craftily
allows each of his myriad characters to shine through
with their own back-stories and various motivations.
Employees are hired overnight; the sudden promise
of success leads to more than one case of, shall
we say, marital strife; the money men get nervous
when they see three new office temps...all of whom
are taking a coffee break at the same time.
Also
quite refreshing is the way in which homosexual
relationships co-exist among "straight folk":
with an air of 'matter-of-factness' and as everyday
experience. I hate to even draw attention to it,
but most movies that feature some form of homosexuality
feel the need to trumpet their 'awareness' and paint
their characters in the broadest brush strokes imaginable.
Clearly that's not the case here.
First-time
writer/director Daniel Gamburg clearly has a canny
ear for the way the 'office folk' communicate.
Taken as either a caustic look back at a sillier
(and greedier) period, or as a busy and affable ensemble
piece, "IPO" marks a rock-solid debut either
way.
|
|
|
|
by Jim Strope |
Enlightened Pictures presents its full-length video
set in San Francisco during the hottest days of Internet
start ups. The personalities, in a fast-paced improvised
sequence, tell their unique stories and common themes
with tender attention to the subtlety and brutality
of relationships. It's about making babies and money.
It's about energy and lots of it. The full-dimensioned
spray of relationships quickly reveals who is with
whom.
The production rests on solid performances by the
extensive cast including Lee Flores Tsoflias, Mark
Rachel, Kerry Gudjohnson, and Matthew Gardner, each
commanding attention by alluding to their delicious
secrets, each providing personal support for the
thematic and photographic structure of the unfolding
drama. David Babich plays Dean, a wild meteor of
a man arcing into close orbit around his beloved,
played by Radha Lorca.
Daniel Gamburg's editing distributed the one hour
and forty-three minute show rather fairly among a
core cast of ten or so. The crew took chances with
the shoot and it paid off in plenty of action and
movement. The neighborhoods are vividly shot and
perhaps more could be made of that, as if the characters
of IPO, in all their specificity, were part of much
larger story, in idea as well as in vision. Shot
without a script, the entire movie was improvised,
producing a selection wide and rich enough in choices
to enable the editor to assemble a set of interleaving
stories rising to climax.
If there was a flaw, it was the suddenness of the
reinforcing of the impending climax by Dean in the
scene in Tahoe. But then again, someone would have
stepped forth to take the scene after the confession
of Mathew and Kerry. And it returned Frank Torrano,
as the policeman, with vengeance (and Dean his target),
characterized the ending, and returned the viewer
and viewed to constant change.
The experiment is an exploration of autonomy as
illustrated by the power and independence of personality.
The production relied on the teamwork of Barewitness.
Their website features shorter work and trailers
as well as contact info about the members.
|
|
| FilmThreat.com |
| Febuary
2, 2004 (source) |
| by Jim Agnew |
| "IPO" tells the tale of a group of San Francisco dot-commers attempting to get rich through
their companies' IPO (initial public offering). The problem? They quickly learn that money and friendship
don’t always go hand in hand, especially
when you have a not so great business plan.
" IPO" starts off as a comedy that appears to be poking fun at the stupidity of the workplace and
the corporate world of self-obsessed dot-commers.
But just as you start to have a good laugh or two, "IPO" suddenly
shifts gears into more serious fare. Then after you
settle into drama mode, "IPO" then again
shifts gears again into tragicomedy mode. And that’s
really the only thing keeping "IPO" from
being a great film, a lack of focus.
All of
the players in "IPO" are magnificent,
which is an amazing feat considering the size and
scope of the cast. But that’s also part of
the problem. There are so many characters and relationships
between them all that you need a chart to keep track
of who’s who. Some of the characters that play
as sub-plots suddenly become dominate players in
the story while other main characters you’ve
been introduced to just suddenly disappear
off the radar.
Director
Daniel Gamburg has put together an interesting
story and a fantastic cast. "IPO" could
have been something really amazing if he
could have just taken all these great elements
and
put them into a more cohesive package,
with a little
more focus.
|
|
|
|